Last changed on
Wed September 20, 2023 at 11:08 AM EDT
Updated: Fall 2022
About myself:
I have debated LD for 3 years. And I have Judged Variety LD prior to Covid-19 and during the pandemic. I graduated from the University of Florida in Business administration with specialization in agriculture and currently Im in graduate school studying Health Administration.
I'm ok with any argument. If you found another Omar Lopera on the judge wiki that sounds like a parent. That's my father(yes we have same named). I'm completely different from my father to judging.
Spreading
I'm ok with spreading just as long if your opponent is ok with spreading. Personally, I think debates get boring if one debater is spreading, while the other debater doesn't understand what's happening.
Secondly, I prefer if your spreading, please tell where you are on the flow and pinpoint to what argument are extending across the flow so I can clearly understand where the argument is.
Larp debate
I'm ok with any plan text argument the consistent with the topic at hand. give me IMPACTS and Warrants.
Phil debate
I personally love the idea of the Phil debate. However if its super deep philosophy, please explain in 1AR or 1NC what it means before you start laying the groundworks for your arguments. I want to make sure I clearly understanding your argument and not misinterpret it. Also, make sure you give me impacts and weighing especially if its ideal vs. policy debate.
Theory
I'm ok with theory. If it is a wordy interp, just simply explains what it means. I believe the theory is the highest level of debate. In my opinion theory debate gets muddled so I wouldn't focus all your time on it. Also please extend the voters it makes judging theory a lot easier. One last thing, do not try frivolous theory, I think its annoying and waste of time.
Kritks
I love Ks. Personally, I think the reject alt is boring, but I won't hold it against you. If you want my vote on the K debate. Really go in for Alt. Without the alt I tend to default aff since most K impacts are that aff continuing a system that bad, and if I don't see an alt then how I see it is why should I care about any of negative impacts if you yourself don't have a solution. So I see the first link, alt then impacts for Ks
DA's
I consider DA as an off so in my view it's above the aff. I see a DA's argument that doing the aff is worst than doing nothing. So aff has the burden to disprove the DA's.
Spikes
I'm not used evaluating theory spikes, so try to avoid them if you can. This more of your benefit since I don't misinterpret a good argument just because I'm used to evaluating them.
Speaker points
You shouldn't expect anything lower than 27. Unless you straight up punch the other debater.
Other than that explain your arguments and you should be fine.
Lastly
Keep grudges at the door.
If their prefer pronouns that debater would like to use. Please address the debater by their pronoun.
Please ask any questions about the round.